<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Replacing 400mm5.6 with used 500mm 4.5 non-IS good idea? in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Replacing-400mm5-6-with-used-500mm-4-5-non-IS-good-idea/m-p/58105#M15773</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thinking of purchasing a used 500mm 4.5 non-IS to replace my 400mm 5.6. It would be used only on a tripod inside of a portable blind. My thinking is that it will do OK without the IS due to the blind keeping the wind off. Any downsides?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm starting to do some in flight bird shots too. Switching from joystick to manfrotto gimbal. Will the 500mm be an improvement, or will the extra reach just be a mistake without IS?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The 500mm IS even used is way out of my budget.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2014 14:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pahranagatman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-01-01T14:33:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Replacing 400mm5.6 with used 500mm 4.5 non-IS good idea?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Replacing-400mm5-6-with-used-500mm-4-5-non-IS-good-idea/m-p/58105#M15773</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thinking of purchasing a used 500mm 4.5 non-IS to replace my 400mm 5.6. It would be used only on a tripod inside of a portable blind. My thinking is that it will do OK without the IS due to the blind keeping the wind off. Any downsides?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm starting to do some in flight bird shots too. Switching from joystick to manfrotto gimbal. Will the 500mm be an improvement, or will the extra reach just be a mistake without IS?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The 500mm IS even used is way out of my budget.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2014 14:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Replacing-400mm5-6-with-used-500mm-4-5-non-IS-good-idea/m-p/58105#M15773</guid>
      <dc:creator>pahranagatman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-01-01T14:33:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Replacing 400mm5.6 with used 500mm 4.5 non-IS good idea?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Replacing-400mm5-6-with-used-500mm-4-5-non-IS-good-idea/m-p/58121#M15774</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You are looking at a lens that has been discontinued a long, long time ago.&amp;nbsp; I suspect that if you have a problem with the lens, you will NOT find parts for it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2014 14:42:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Replacing-400mm5-6-with-used-500mm-4-5-non-IS-good-idea/m-p/58121#M15774</guid>
      <dc:creator>Harv</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-01-01T14:42:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

