<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: canon lens in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/167147#M15156</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Yes the Sigma 150-600 Sport is really that heavy. It weighs almost twice as much as the&amp;nbsp;EF 100-400 L IS II (6.3 lbs vs 3.5 lbs). Of course you can handhold it, but, I can tell you from experience it is a pain to carry that heavy of a lens around."&lt;/EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have been weighing the pros and cons between those two lenses.&amp;nbsp; I'm not the robust fellow that I used to be.&amp;nbsp; I have been leaning more and more towards the Canon.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"Sigma lenses will AF at their long end on Canon EOS cameras despite the f/6.3 apperture."&amp;nbsp; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think he may have been referring to using the 1.4x extender with the lens.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 21:10:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-03-11T21:10:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>canon lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/167128#M15148</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am trying to decide weather to sell the 100-400 mk2 then get the sigma sport 150-600 i use 600d and 7d the 100-400 with 1.4x will not auto focus any advice? I watch a guy on you tube who hand holds the sigma 150-600 sport . are you sure its heavy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkAat75_QGI" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkAat75_QGI&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 19:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/167128#M15148</guid>
      <dc:creator>paulbrogden10</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-11T19:38:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: canon lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/167132#M15149</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What would be your reasoning for changing from the Canon to the Sigma?&amp;nbsp; Ability to Auto Focus with the 1.4x?&amp;nbsp; I would not expect the Sigma to auto focus any better with the extender&amp;nbsp;than the Canon, due to their f/stops.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:09:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/167132#M15149</guid>
      <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-11T20:09:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: canon lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/167135#M15150</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Both the 600D and 7D require a lens of f/5.6 or faster for autofocus. Thus if you want to add a 1.4x extender you need to start with a lens of f/4 or faster.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Sigma is f/5-6.3, so it would autofocus in the short end, but would not autofocus at the high end.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looks like before the lens gets to 400mm it falls below f/5.6.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thus there would seem to be no advantage compared to the 100-400 w/1.4X. And the Canon Mk II lens is a fantastic lens.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/9118i8C23FF72ACCA25D2/image-size/original?v=mpbl-1&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="Capture.JPG" title="Capture.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:36:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/167135#M15150</guid>
      <dc:creator>jrhoffman75</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-11T20:36:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: canon lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/167136#M15151</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/73479"&gt;@paulbrogden10&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am trying to decide weather to sell the 100-400 mk2 then get the sigma sport 150-600 i use 600d and 7d the 100-400 with 1.4x will not auto focus any advice? I watch a guy on you tube who hand holds the sigma 150-600 sport . are you sure its heavy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkAat75_QGI" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkAat75_QGI&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;The 7D Mk II will autofocus with the EF 100-400 L IS II and a 1.4X TC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes the Sigma 150-600 Sport is really that heavy. It weighs almost twice as much as the&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;EF 100-400 L IS II (6.3 lbs vs 3.5 lbs). Of course you can handhold it, but, I can tell you from experience it is a pain to carry that heavy of a lens around.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:40:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/167136#M15151</guid>
      <dc:creator>TTMartin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-11T20:40:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: canon lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/167137#M15152</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;"The 7D Mk II will autofocus with the EF 100-400 L IS II and a 1.4X TC."&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think you can add the 5D Mk III, and all of the 1D series to that list of camera bodies that would work.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:43:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/167137#M15152</guid>
      <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-11T20:43:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: canon lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/167139#M15153</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1093"&gt;@jrhoffman75&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Sigma is f/5-6.3, so it would autofocus in the short end, but would not autofocus at the high end.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sigma lenses will AF at their long end on Canon EOS cameras despite the f/6.3 apperture.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:44:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/167139#M15153</guid>
      <dc:creator>TTMartin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-11T20:44:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: canon lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/167140#M15154</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/65668"&gt;@Waddizzle&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;"The 7D Mk II will autofocus with the EF 100-400 L IS II and a 1.4X TC."&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think you can add the 5D Mk III, and all of the 1D series to that list of camera bodies that would work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;I agree, I was trying to hint that it might be worth upgrading his camera to the 7D Mk II in this case rather than looking at a different lens. Going from a 7D to a 7D Mk II is a bigger jump in overall performance that most people realize. Another option would be the 80D which will AF with the&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;EF 100-400 L IS II and a 1.4X TC III with 27 of it's 45 AF points not just the center one.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.learn.usa.canon.com/resources/articles/2016/eos-80D/af_at_f8.shtml" target="_self"&gt;http://www.learn.usa.canon.com/resources/articles/2016/eos-80D/af_at_f8.shtml&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:49:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/167140#M15154</guid>
      <dc:creator>TTMartin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-11T20:49:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: canon lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/167144#M15155</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;"Another option would be the 80D which will AF with the&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;EF 100-400 L IS II and a 1.4X TC III with 27 of it's 45 AF points not just the center one."&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Yeah, I read that and have been experimenting with shooting more AF points than just the center.&amp;nbsp; It doesn't work when you're trying to pick out a bird hidden in the branches, and there a lot of branches between you and the bird.&amp;nbsp; Only the center AF point pulls that one off.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;You guys have me looking up into the trees now.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 21:05:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/167144#M15155</guid>
      <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-11T21:05:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: canon lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/167147#M15156</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Yes the Sigma 150-600 Sport is really that heavy. It weighs almost twice as much as the&amp;nbsp;EF 100-400 L IS II (6.3 lbs vs 3.5 lbs). Of course you can handhold it, but, I can tell you from experience it is a pain to carry that heavy of a lens around."&lt;/EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have been weighing the pros and cons between those two lenses.&amp;nbsp; I'm not the robust fellow that I used to be.&amp;nbsp; I have been leaning more and more towards the Canon.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"Sigma lenses will AF at their long end on Canon EOS cameras despite the f/6.3 apperture."&amp;nbsp; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think he may have been referring to using the 1.4x extender with the lens.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 21:10:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/167147#M15156</guid>
      <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-11T21:10:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: canon lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/167166#M15157</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Why do you think you need the Sport vs the Contempory? What are your intended uses? AND I agree that a 7D2 may be a more cost effective upgrade. That said a 7D2 &amp;amp; 150-600 C is not that far off what just the Sport might cost.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2016 03:41:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/167166#M15157</guid>
      <dc:creator>cicopo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-12T03:41:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: canon lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/167235#M15158</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"...&amp;nbsp;who hand holds the sigma 150-600 sport . are you sure its heavy."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Yes I am sure it is that heavy. &amp;nbsp;It is possible to hand hold it for a shot or two. &amp;nbsp;But you will not do it for an &amp;nbsp;hour or two. &amp;nbsp;I guarantee&amp;nbsp;it!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have all three of the current 150-600mm offerings. &amp;nbsp;The C, the S and the Tammy. &amp;nbsp;IMHO, the choice is between the S and the Tamron. The reason it the Tamron is somewhat weather sealed the Sigma C is not. &amp;nbsp;The bottom&amp;nbsp;line is the Sigma S is the best of the three. &amp;nbsp;It approaches&amp;nbsp;what Canon makes in the super tele L series.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;MPO is I don't like tele converters. &amp;nbsp;So if I want a true 600mm I have to use one of these lenses. &amp;nbsp;I would prefer Canon made the 100-400 Mk II a 100-600 Mk II but they didn't. &amp;nbsp;The Siggy S is the closest you can come to a Canon L.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Listen to me. &amp;nbsp;I am a guy that carries two 1 series all the time. &amp;nbsp;Sometimes with big lenses but always with an L type lens. &amp;nbsp;I can tell you the S is heavy. &amp;nbsp;Even for me!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2016 23:20:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/167235#M15158</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-12T23:20:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: canon lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/167236#M15159</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Oh, BTW, the S focuses faster than either of the other two. &amp;nbsp;At least it does on a 1D Mk IV, which can focus with a f8 lens.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But even if it could only do f5.6 you can still use any of these lenses, without tele converters, as they all focus at the lens f5 aperture.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's all good, aint it?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2016 23:23:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/167236#M15159</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-12T23:23:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: canon lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/167593#M15160</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hi guys why not watch my video and let me know what you think I am still woundering if i should get the sigma 150-600.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://youtu.be/OyZayMBR9Mo" target="_blank"&gt;https://youtu.be/OyZayMBR9Mo&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 01:43:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/167593#M15160</guid>
      <dc:creator>paulbrogden10</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-17T01:43:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: canon lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/167643#M15161</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I was not sure either, so I rented one, liked the one I rented and purchased it from the rental company.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:17:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/167643#M15161</guid>
      <dc:creator>kvbarkley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-17T14:17:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: canon lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/168011#M15162</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;my point was the 100-400 needs an extender to reach the 600 range so its 1.4x on 100-400 vs sigma 600 on my crop 7d body.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 10:47:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/canon-lens/m-p/168011#M15162</guid>
      <dc:creator>paulbrogden10</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-21T10:47:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

