<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Sigma 50-500mm OS in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Sigma-50-500mm-OS/m-p/163106#M14800</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;So, I see that the Sigma 150-500mm OS is considered a decent budget lens, the Sigma 150-600mm OS C is a lens to be proud of and the S model is pretty much an L series and the Canon 100-400mmL IS II is the best lens, with a shorter range. But In the recent threads on telephotos I don't see any mention of the Sigma 50-500mm OS. Where does it fall In your opinion?&lt;BR /&gt;It appeals to me for the 50mm on a telephoto, but because it is so wide with such a range does it have the same problems that a lot of super zooms do?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2016 23:42:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Elf_f_f</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-01-30T23:42:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Sigma 50-500mm OS</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Sigma-50-500mm-OS/m-p/163106#M14800</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So, I see that the Sigma 150-500mm OS is considered a decent budget lens, the Sigma 150-600mm OS C is a lens to be proud of and the S model is pretty much an L series and the Canon 100-400mmL IS II is the best lens, with a shorter range. But In the recent threads on telephotos I don't see any mention of the Sigma 50-500mm OS. Where does it fall In your opinion?&lt;BR /&gt;It appeals to me for the 50mm on a telephoto, but because it is so wide with such a range does it have the same problems that a lot of super zooms do?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2016 23:42:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Sigma-50-500mm-OS/m-p/163106#M14800</guid>
      <dc:creator>Elf_f_f</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-30T23:42:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sigma 50-500mm OS</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Sigma-50-500mm-OS/m-p/163129#M14801</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;And all super zooms have the same problem, the larger the zoom range, the more compromises that have to be made to achieve that zoom range.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2016 11:48:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Sigma-50-500mm-OS/m-p/163129#M14801</guid>
      <dc:creator>TTMartin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-31T11:48:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sigma 50-500mm OS</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Sigma-50-500mm-OS/m-p/163152#M14802</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"Where does it fall In your opinion?"&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Sigma&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN&gt;50-500mm f/4.5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM Lens would be in last place. &amp;nbsp;I think it is to be discontinued shortly. &amp;nbsp;Especially since there is a large price drop on it right now.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Mr. Martin is correct saying the larger the zoom range, the more difficulities in getting everything to work well together. &amp;nbsp;And a 10 to 1 range is pretty big.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The bottom line in this debate is do you need 600mm? &amp;nbsp;If you do get the Sigma "C" or "S". &amp;nbsp;If you don't get the EF 100-400mm Mk II. &amp;nbsp;The choice is simple!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2016 16:21:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Sigma-50-500mm-OS/m-p/163152#M14802</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-31T16:21:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

