<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Stacking 2.0 &amp;amp; 1.4 Teleconvertor with 12mm ext tube in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301576#M14014</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="andale mono,times" size="2" color="#993300"&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3485"&gt;@ebiggs1&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Years, and years ago I tried to use a 1.4x, a 2x and a 3x tel con stacked together on a FD 300mm f4 lens.&amp;nbsp; I found out quickly it was a horrible&amp;nbsp;idea.&amp;nbsp; I suspect you will come to the same conclusion..................soon, I hope.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="andale mono,times" size="2" color="#993300"&gt;Quite so.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IMHO, the use of any tel-con or x-tube is a bandaide fix for a problem that requires the proper lens alone.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="andale mono,times" color="#993300"&gt;I don't althgether afree. My 70-200mm f/2.8 tolerates the 1.4x III quite well, I think.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/22928i46528ECAA441C152/image-size/original?v=1.0&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="RC4_1629.JPG" title="RC4_1629.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 23:35:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RobertTheFat</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-04-06T23:35:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Stacking 2.0 &amp; 1.4 Teleconvertor with 12mm ext tube</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301451#M14004</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have an EOS7dii, with my 100-400mm canon lens I attached a 2.0 tc with a 12mm lens tube to a 1.4 tc. &amp;nbsp;The first time, no problem, second time lens doesn't seem to focus at in manual focus. &amp;nbsp;The lens &amp;amp; teleconvertors are all Canon gear.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any suggestions?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2020 23:14:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301451#M14004</guid>
      <dc:creator>LarryS1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-05T23:14:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stacking 2.0 &amp; 1.4 Teleconvertor with 12mm ext tube</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301452#M14005</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I suggest that you forget the idea of using the 2x teleconverter and the macro tube together. &amp;nbsp;In fact, I suggest that you forget the idea of using either one of them with that lens. &amp;nbsp;Buy a real macro lens, instead.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why is it that you cannot focus on anything? &amp;nbsp;Physics. &amp;nbsp;A macro tube reduces the MFD, minimum focusing distance, by sacrificing your ability to focus the lens at infinity. &amp;nbsp;But, if all you are trying to do is focus on something very small and close to the camera, what difference does it make if you cannot focus out to infinity? &amp;nbsp;None, it does not make any difference.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Except, if a little is good, then more is not always better. &amp;nbsp;By adding the 2x TC, you have probably magnified the 2x teleconverter's effect to the point where the MFD is probably INSIDE of the lens barrel. &amp;nbsp;Remember, MFD is measured from the image sensor, not the end of the lens.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2020 23:22:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301452#M14005</guid>
      <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-05T23:22:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stacking 2.0 &amp; 1.4 Teleconvertor with 12mm ext tube</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301453#M14006</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I was trying to extend my zoom lens, by adding the 2.0 &amp;amp; 1.4 tc, in a series to my lens. &amp;nbsp;I was told that could be done by attaching the ext tube to allow both teleconvertors to connect to each other. &amp;nbsp;What's strange is it worked the first time I tried it, when I went in the field to &amp;nbsp;try it, the lens wouldn't focus. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2020 23:29:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301453#M14006</guid>
      <dc:creator>LarryS1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-05T23:29:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stacking 2.0 &amp; 1.4 Teleconvertor with 12mm ext tube</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301458#M14007</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The 100-400 is a slow lens with variable aperture from 4.5-5.6&amp;nbsp; and even the 1 series cannot use AF with the very high minimum aperture created by this lens with stacked converters.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Using two in combination EVEN with a very good sharp prime will result in a tremendous loss of IQ and to AF with two converters on a lens you would need a fairly fast lens on a 1 series body.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rodger&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 00:14:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301458#M14007</guid>
      <dc:creator>wq9nsc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-06T00:14:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stacking 2.0 &amp; 1.4 Teleconvertor with 12mm ext tube</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301466#M14008</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Doing things like this quickly leads to diminishing returns, if not negative returns. While one Canon TC is probably effective, adding anything else is probably no better than cropping.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 02:17:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301466#M14008</guid>
      <dc:creator>kvbarkley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-06T02:17:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stacking 2.0 &amp; 1.4 Teleconvertor with 12mm ext tube</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301472#M14009</link>
      <description>I tried 2xIII+12mm macro tube+1.4II+300/2.8L IS+M5. It works, even when focusing to infinity or the moon. The image quality is "OK" at short distance like 20 meters.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 05:23:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301472#M14009</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-06T05:23:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stacking 2.0 &amp; 1.4 Teleconvertor with 12mm ext tube</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301483#M14010</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Peter, thanks for trying and letting me know it worked for you. &amp;nbsp;I had tried it a week ago, and I was able to focus on distant objects. &amp;nbsp;Then went out this last weekend for the purpose I intended on, I couldn't get any of the lenses I tried (24-70, 70-200 or my 100-400). &amp;nbsp;I wish I could figure out what went wrong with the camera.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i really appreciate your efforts and response,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 12:00:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301483#M14010</guid>
      <dc:creator>LarryS1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-06T12:00:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stacking 2.0 &amp; 1.4 Teleconvertor with 12mm ext tube</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301486#M14011</link>
      <description>Perhaps lack of light.&lt;BR /&gt;Have you tried Live view?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 12:48:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301486#M14011</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-06T12:48:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stacking 2.0 &amp; 1.4 Teleconvertor with 12mm ext tube</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301497#M14012</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Years, and years ago I tried to use a 1.4x, a 2x and a 3x tel con stacked together on a FD 300mm f4 lens.&amp;nbsp; I found out quickly it was a horrible&amp;nbsp;idea.&amp;nbsp; I suspect you will come to the same conclusion..................soon, I hope.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IMHO, the use of any tel-con or x-tube is a bandaide fix for a problem that requires the proper lens alone.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 14:25:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301497#M14012</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-06T14:25:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stacking 2.0 &amp; 1.4 Teleconvertor with 12mm ext tube</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301554#M14013</link>
      <description>Some raw files to play around with. x1.4II+x2III vs x2III.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SwItmSZG9Wu4J1a1EYQ8_rA5SsGrGh7W/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank"&gt;https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SwItmSZG9Wu4J1a1EYQ8_rA5SsGrGh7W/view?usp=sharing&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 19:42:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301554#M14013</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-06T19:42:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stacking 2.0 &amp; 1.4 Teleconvertor with 12mm ext tube</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301576#M14014</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="andale mono,times" size="2" color="#993300"&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3485"&gt;@ebiggs1&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Years, and years ago I tried to use a 1.4x, a 2x and a 3x tel con stacked together on a FD 300mm f4 lens.&amp;nbsp; I found out quickly it was a horrible&amp;nbsp;idea.&amp;nbsp; I suspect you will come to the same conclusion..................soon, I hope.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="andale mono,times" size="2" color="#993300"&gt;Quite so.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IMHO, the use of any tel-con or x-tube is a bandaide fix for a problem that requires the proper lens alone.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="andale mono,times" color="#993300"&gt;I don't althgether afree. My 70-200mm f/2.8 tolerates the 1.4x III quite well, I think.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/22928i46528ECAA441C152/image-size/original?v=1.0&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="RC4_1629.JPG" title="RC4_1629.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 23:35:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301576#M14014</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobertTheFat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-06T23:35:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stacking 2.0 &amp; 1.4 Teleconvertor with 12mm ext tube</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301588#M14015</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I tried it again, it worked. &amp;nbsp;I believe your comment about light had something to do with it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Quality wasn't as good as I'm sure a 500mm or 600 mm with a 2x tc, but detail wasn't as bad as I expected.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks again Peter, I appreciate your input.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2020 03:31:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301588#M14015</guid>
      <dc:creator>LarryS1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-07T03:31:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stacking 2.0 &amp; 1.4 Teleconvertor with 12mm ext tube</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301613#M14016</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"Quality wasn't as good&amp;nbsp;..."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It all has to do with what you call "quality".&amp;nbsp; That elusive word has different meanings to everybody.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2020 12:08:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301613#M14016</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-07T12:08:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stacking 2.0 &amp; 1.4 Teleconvertor with 12mm ext tube</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301614#M14017</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"&lt;FONT face="andale mono,times" size="2" color="#993300"&gt;Quite so.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;IMHO, the use of any tel-con or x-tube is a bandaide fix for a problem that requires the proper lens alone.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT face="andale mono,times" color="#993300"&gt;I don't althgether afree. My 70-200mm f/2.8 tolerates the 1.4x III quite well, I think."&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="andale mono,times" color="#000000"&gt;Perhaps acceptable, I freely admit.&amp;nbsp; One of the very few lens combos I agree do work well with the 1.4x tel-con is the ef 70-200mm f2.8L.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="andale mono,times" color="#000000"&gt;Two things, though, the ef 70-200mm f2.8L has a lot of IQ it can afford to loose.&amp;nbsp; Second did you take the same shot with, say, the ef 300mm f4L prime lens to compare?&amp;nbsp; No, I didn't think so!&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="andale mono,times" color="#000000"&gt;A tel-con may be the answer but it is never the best answer, IMHO, of course,&amp;nbsp;as always.&amp;nbsp;&lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://community.usa.canon.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2020 12:14:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301614#M14017</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-07T12:14:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stacking 2.0 &amp; 1.4 Teleconvertor with 12mm ext tube</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301617#M14018</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3485"&gt;@ebiggs1&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"&lt;FONT face="andale mono,times" size="2" color="#993300"&gt;Quite so.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;IMHO, the use of any tel-con or x-tube is a bandaide fix for a problem that requires the proper lens alone.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT face="andale mono,times" color="#993300"&gt;I don't althgether afree. My 70-200mm f/2.8 tolerates the 1.4x III quite well, I think."&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="andale mono,times" color="#000000"&gt;Perhaps acceptable, I freely admit.&amp;nbsp; One of the very few lens combos I agree do work well with the 1.4x tel-con is the ef 70-200mm f2.8L.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="andale mono,times" color="#000000"&gt;Two things, though, the ef 70-200mm f2.8L has a lot of IQ it can afford to loose.&amp;nbsp; Second did you take the same shot with, say, the ef 300mm f4L prime lens to compare?&amp;nbsp; No, I didn't think so!&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="andale mono,times" color="#000000"&gt;A tel-con may be the answer but it is never the best answer, IMHO, of course,&amp;nbsp;as always.&amp;nbsp;&lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://community.usa.canon.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well, you knew the answer to that question, Ernie, because you know that I agree with your oft-stated opinion that modern zooms have relegated the prime lens to niche product status. &amp;nbsp;&lt;img id="smileywink" class="emoticon emoticon-smileywink" src="https://community.usa.canon.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-wink.png" alt="Smiley Wink" title="Smiley Wink" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our household contains, IIRC, two prime lenses: my wife's EF-S 60mm macro (which she likes a lot) and a Sigma 30mm f/1.4 that I bought as a low-light lens for my XTi thirteen years ago and have almost never used.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2020 12:34:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301617#M14018</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobertTheFat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-07T12:34:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stacking 2.0 &amp; 1.4 Teleconvertor with 12mm ext tube</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301625#M14019</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"...&amp;nbsp;modern zooms have relegated the prime lens to niche product status."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Absolutely!&amp;nbsp; There are very good zooms out there now.&amp;nbsp; However, there are great zooms out there, too.&amp;nbsp; Canon's 70-200mm f2.8L series has proven that over and over.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have the 1.4x tel-con. I have used it perhaps a dozen times.&amp;nbsp; Maybe because I have two wonderful&amp;nbsp;alternatives. One being the excellent, in its own right, ef 300mm f4L IS.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2020 12:46:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301625#M14019</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-07T12:46:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stacking 2.0 &amp; 1.4 Teleconvertor with 12mm ext tube</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301628#M14020</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"Some raw files to play around with. x1.4II+x2III vs x2III."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Your files are too large. Nobody is going to d/l such large files.&amp;nbsp; Not me anyway!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2020 12:53:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301628#M14020</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-07T12:53:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stacking 2.0 &amp; 1.4 Teleconvertor with 12mm ext tube</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301630#M14021</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3485"&gt;@ebiggs1&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"Some raw files to play around with. x1.4II+x2III vs x2III."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Your files are too large. Nobody is going to d/l such large files.&amp;nbsp; Not me anyway!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;You still pay for each MB you use or don't have 406 MB of free space?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2020 13:45:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301630#M14021</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-07T13:45:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stacking 2.0 &amp; 1.4 Teleconvertor with 12mm ext tube</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301640#M14022</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yeah they are too big to glance at. A simple jpg would suffice&amp;nbsp;for your claims.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2020 14:30:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Stacking-2-0-amp-1-4-Teleconvertor-with-12mm-ext-tube/m-p/301640#M14022</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-07T14:30:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

