<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Telephoto Lens for Wildlife Photography!! in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Telephoto-Lens-for-Wildlife-Photography/m-p/279222#M13303</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The Canon 400 F5.6 is among the best bargains in Canon L series lens family.&amp;nbsp; I bought one when I picked up a 1D M2 back in 2005 and have taken a lot of images with it.&amp;nbsp; It is sharp with fast focus and it is very light for a 400mm. It works well with a 1.4X to take you out to 560mm BUT the "cost" of a light 400mm is it isn't a fast lens and that becomes a bigger issue when you add an 1.4X extender.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now my most used telephoto is a 300mm 2.8 which is fast and about as heavy as I want to handhold for any length of time.&amp;nbsp; It works well with both 1.4X and 2.0X Canon extenders and is incredibly sharp.&amp;nbsp; But it is much bigger glass and far more expensive than the 400mm 5.6.&amp;nbsp; The 400 2.8 is a very nice Canon lens but I have the previous versoin which is really heavy to handhold for long periods of time thus it spends a lot of time in its case; the newest version would be a nice choice with its reduced weight and better balance but I can't justify the cost to myself yet.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With wildlife, it is rare that you can ever have too long of a lens and fast is also nice because the wider aperture provides faster autofocus but long plus fast equals very expesnive and heavy.&amp;nbsp; I don't use my 400 2.8 as much for sports because I prefer the rapid mobility of fully handheld so the 300 2.8 has become my go to field lens for sports.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Keep an eye on the Canon store for their refurb/return lens because you may find what you are looking for at a good price.&amp;nbsp; A used lens from another source can be a good deal but use caution with ebay or similar for an expensive lens.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rodger&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 12:41:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>wq9nsc</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-08-14T12:41:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Telephoto Lens for Wildlife Photography!!</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Telephoto-Lens-for-Wildlife-Photography/m-p/279204#M13300</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey guys I have a Canon 77D, and I had a Tamron 70-300 VC, but I ditched it for the canon 55-250 STM because it was much sharper and half as light! I love it! But I love Wildlife photography, and I’m looking to buy my first L lens and I am curious for some suggestions. I want to make my money count but I want to spend enough to get a lens that I can get some really sharp and incredible photo’s! I was looking at some telephoto prime L lenses but I’m not sure which ones are the best. I take pictures of all types of wildelife, from birds to deer etc. thank you for you time!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 07:25:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Telephoto-Lens-for-Wildlife-Photography/m-p/279204#M13300</guid>
      <dc:creator>pumba</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-14T07:25:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Telephoto Lens for Wildlife Photography!!</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Telephoto-Lens-for-Wildlife-Photography/m-p/279212#M13301</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/123392"&gt;@pumba&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hey guys I have a Canon 77D, and I had a Tamron 70-300 VC, but I ditched it for the canon 55-250 STM because it was &lt;STRONG&gt;much sharper and half as light&lt;/STRONG&gt;! I love it! But I love Wildlife photography, and I’m looking to buy my first L lens and I am curious for some suggestions. I want to make my money count but I want to spend enough to get a lens that I can get some really sharp and incredible photo’s! I was looking at some telephoto prime L lenses but I’m not sure which ones are the best. I take pictures of all types of wildelife, from birds to deer etc. thank you for you time!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Telephoto lens and lightweight do not fit together very well. &amp;nbsp;You might want to look at the Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But, if you are just starting out you might be better off with a a zoom. &amp;nbsp;Sigma and Tamron both make 100-400mm zooms, as well as Canon, but at a much higher selling price. &amp;nbsp;Depending upon what you want to shoot, a 400mm may be too short. &amp;nbsp;When it comes to wildlife and focal length, the more the better.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are the 150-600mm lenses, which are very popular. &amp;nbsp;Sigma makes “C” and “S” versions. &amp;nbsp;Tamron sells its’ “G2” version. &amp;nbsp;These lenses are big and heavy, are not exactly made for walking around like your 55-250mm.. &amp;nbsp;Find yourself a hideaway, and use a monopod or tripod for extended use.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:00:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Telephoto-Lens-for-Wildlife-Photography/m-p/279212#M13301</guid>
      <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-14T11:00:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Telephoto Lens for Wildlife Photography!!</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Telephoto-Lens-for-Wildlife-Photography/m-p/279220#M13302</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have both the Sigma 100-400 C and an older Tamron 150-600 G1 that I use for wildlife photography with my 80D.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Sigma is more compact, weighs less, and is easier to carry. &amp;nbsp;The Tamron is large and heavy, but either lens really benefits from a good, padded shoulder strap on the camera body. &amp;nbsp;A standard neck strap is very uncomfortable with these heavy lenses. &amp;nbsp;The Tamron has a tripod collar, the Sigma does not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AF on both lenses is good, and both offer fairly good sharpness, especially when used short of their full focal lengths and at f/8 +/- depending on conditions. &amp;nbsp;The Sigma dock, an option, offers very simple firmware upgrades via a USB connection to your computer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another benefit of the larger lens is the ability to get some really impressive shots of the moon. &amp;nbsp;A nice, stable subject that doesn’t run or fly away when it sees the reflection off your lens. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":face_with_tears_of_joy:"&gt;😂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 12:31:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Telephoto-Lens-for-Wildlife-Photography/m-p/279220#M13302</guid>
      <dc:creator>StanNH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-14T12:31:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Telephoto Lens for Wildlife Photography!!</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Telephoto-Lens-for-Wildlife-Photography/m-p/279222#M13303</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The Canon 400 F5.6 is among the best bargains in Canon L series lens family.&amp;nbsp; I bought one when I picked up a 1D M2 back in 2005 and have taken a lot of images with it.&amp;nbsp; It is sharp with fast focus and it is very light for a 400mm. It works well with a 1.4X to take you out to 560mm BUT the "cost" of a light 400mm is it isn't a fast lens and that becomes a bigger issue when you add an 1.4X extender.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now my most used telephoto is a 300mm 2.8 which is fast and about as heavy as I want to handhold for any length of time.&amp;nbsp; It works well with both 1.4X and 2.0X Canon extenders and is incredibly sharp.&amp;nbsp; But it is much bigger glass and far more expensive than the 400mm 5.6.&amp;nbsp; The 400 2.8 is a very nice Canon lens but I have the previous versoin which is really heavy to handhold for long periods of time thus it spends a lot of time in its case; the newest version would be a nice choice with its reduced weight and better balance but I can't justify the cost to myself yet.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With wildlife, it is rare that you can ever have too long of a lens and fast is also nice because the wider aperture provides faster autofocus but long plus fast equals very expesnive and heavy.&amp;nbsp; I don't use my 400 2.8 as much for sports because I prefer the rapid mobility of fully handheld so the 300 2.8 has become my go to field lens for sports.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Keep an eye on the Canon store for their refurb/return lens because you may find what you are looking for at a good price.&amp;nbsp; A used lens from another source can be a good deal but use caution with ebay or similar for an expensive lens.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rodger&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 12:41:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Telephoto-Lens-for-Wildlife-Photography/m-p/279222#M13303</guid>
      <dc:creator>wq9nsc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-14T12:41:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Telephoto Lens for Wildlife Photography!!</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Telephoto-Lens-for-Wildlife-Photography/m-p/279230#M13304</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#3366FF"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;The Canon 400 F5.6 is among the best bargains in Canon L series lens family.&amp;nbsp; ... It is sharp with fast focus and it is very light for a 400mm. It works well with a 1.4X to take you out to 560mm BUT the "cost" of a light 400mm is it isn't a fast lens and that becomes a bigger issue when you add an 1.4X extender.&lt;/EM&gt;"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;WOW, I could have quoted this entire post. I agree with it almost in its entirety.&amp;nbsp; I will add a small correction, the ef 400mm L lens will act like nearly 900mm on a 77D with the 1.4x tele con. That is major league focal length. Enough&amp;nbsp;for anybody but it will be somewhat slow. My preference&amp;nbsp;for a tele lens and a telcon package is the ef 300mm f4 IS L. It offers a couple advantages. First it is a full stop faster and offers an equivalent of nearly 500mm on your 77D with IS and f4 aperture. With the tel con installed it becomes over 675mm. I understand this is less FL compared to the 400mil but don't forget you got the real advantage of IS with this set up.&amp;nbsp; Win, win all around. Plus the 300mil is even sharper then the very good 400mil is. All this is a little expensive but a real bargain&amp;nbsp;for what you get. The best part it is all Canon and all Canon quality. Keep in mind this is not a throw it on and run with it purchase. It will take a bit of experience and learning to use it at its fullest.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If you decide to go the 150-600 super zoom route buy the Tamron G2 model. At the present time it is the best one.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 14:17:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Telephoto-Lens-for-Wildlife-Photography/m-p/279230#M13304</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-14T14:17:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Telephoto Lens for Wildlife Photography!!</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Telephoto-Lens-for-Wildlife-Photography/m-p/279257#M13305</link>
      <description>As far as using the 1.4x with the EF 400mm f/5.6 goes, better check to see if the 77D can focus at f/8.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 17:16:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Telephoto-Lens-for-Wildlife-Photography/m-p/279257#M13305</guid>
      <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-14T17:16:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Telephoto Lens for Wildlife Photography!!</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Telephoto-Lens-for-Wildlife-Photography/m-p/279339#M13306</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I agree. It is just another one of the pit falls using a tel con or any adapter to try and make stuff work.&amp;nbsp; Native is always best.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't like'em, never did. However, I admit some, very few, lens/tel con do work pretty well.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2019 16:01:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Telephoto-Lens-for-Wildlife-Photography/m-p/279339#M13306</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-15T16:01:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

