<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Nifty 50... how are you *so* nifty??! in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Nifty-50-how-are-you-so-nifty/m-p/324427#M1172</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"The 24-70, which should by all accounts (not least of which is cost) be an outstanding lens,..."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It is an outstanding lens.&amp;nbsp; No way the 50mil is better.&amp;nbsp; This only leaves you with something you did or are missing. A sample photo showing what you are getting would possibly help diagnosing the problem. Include the exif data, too.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am in total agreement with my friend above to stick with ef-m format lenses. You bought an M camera so use what is purposely designed for it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2020 14:04:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-11-16T14:04:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Nifty 50... how are you *so* nifty??!</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Nifty-50-how-are-you-so-nifty/m-p/324406#M1170</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Well, this one is baffling. Would love to get your takes on it...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After playing quite a bit with the 50/1.8 I got for my new M50 and learning more about lenses, I started exploring other prime lenses and zooms through a local rental place, which has been great.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Recently I wanted to try zooms that had 50mm around the middle to make my portrait work easier.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After playing with a few, I've run back, contrite and plaintive, to my nifty begging to be taken back; I think I shan't ever stray again, my love.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Today, I tried an EF 24-70MM F2.8L II (rental) and my brother's EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS. I was expecting different results due to angle of view, but what blew me away was *color*. The 24-70, which should by all accounts (not least of which is cost) be an outstanding lens, delivered these pale, insipid shots. I swapped the 50 back on there and POW- back to the love of my photographic life. Then just for fun I put on the EF-S, and it was super pale.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't get it. Light would make sense, perspective certainly would, sharpness, detail, any or all of it. But color??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are the coatings that different between the lenses? Or is something else at play?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks so much as always, everyone!!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2020 05:43:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Nifty-50-how-are-you-so-nifty/m-p/324406#M1170</guid>
      <dc:creator>bigbrother</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-16T05:43:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nifty 50... how are you *so* nifty??!</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Nifty-50-how-are-you-so-nifty/m-p/324413#M1171</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;All lenses are different. &amp;nbsp;Do you install lens profiles in your camera? &amp;nbsp;I would stick to native EF-M mount lenses. &amp;nbsp;The EF/EF-S mount lenses are much larger, and consume a lot of battery power to focus.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One of the best lenses for the EF-M mount in my opinion is the Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM. Try it. &amp;nbsp;You'll love it!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:13:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Nifty-50-how-are-you-so-nifty/m-p/324413#M1171</guid>
      <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-16T12:13:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nifty 50... how are you *so* nifty??!</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Nifty-50-how-are-you-so-nifty/m-p/324427#M1172</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"The 24-70, which should by all accounts (not least of which is cost) be an outstanding lens,..."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It is an outstanding lens.&amp;nbsp; No way the 50mil is better.&amp;nbsp; This only leaves you with something you did or are missing. A sample photo showing what you are getting would possibly help diagnosing the problem. Include the exif data, too.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am in total agreement with my friend above to stick with ef-m format lenses. You bought an M camera so use what is purposely designed for it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2020 14:04:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Nifty-50-how-are-you-so-nifty/m-p/324427#M1172</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-16T14:04:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

