<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Worth upgrading printer for cardstock? in Desktop Inkjet Printers</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Desktop-Inkjet-Printers/Worth-upgrading-printer-for-cardstock/m-p/93950#M5391</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, I am looking into upgrading our current printer Canon Pixma 882 and we are thinking about getting a Canon Pixma Pro-100 which would end up being around $100 after rebate from B&amp;amp;H. It seems that both printers use the same type of ink (Chromalife 100+) which is dye based. The printing that we will be doing is mostly on an 80-110 lbs. cardstock. We don't currently print professional photographs, only family photographs every once in a while.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you guys think it would make a huge difference to upgrade from our current printer to the Pixma Pro-100 or would it really merit the extra cost to get a pigment based printer like Canon's Pixma Pro-10? For what I have read, Canon states that the Chromalife 100+ should last for around 100 years without fading. However, I haven't been able to find any info that confirms this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not well versed in printers and most of the information I have read comparing pigment with dye printers focuses on printing on photo paper instead of cardstock. Our main concern is that prints on Canon's Pixma Pro-100 would fade too soon.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2014 20:33:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jonathane40</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-05-18T20:33:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Worth upgrading printer for cardstock?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Desktop-Inkjet-Printers/Worth-upgrading-printer-for-cardstock/m-p/93950#M5391</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, I am looking into upgrading our current printer Canon Pixma 882 and we are thinking about getting a Canon Pixma Pro-100 which would end up being around $100 after rebate from B&amp;amp;H. It seems that both printers use the same type of ink (Chromalife 100+) which is dye based. The printing that we will be doing is mostly on an 80-110 lbs. cardstock. We don't currently print professional photographs, only family photographs every once in a while.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you guys think it would make a huge difference to upgrade from our current printer to the Pixma Pro-100 or would it really merit the extra cost to get a pigment based printer like Canon's Pixma Pro-10? For what I have read, Canon states that the Chromalife 100+ should last for around 100 years without fading. However, I haven't been able to find any info that confirms this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not well versed in printers and most of the information I have read comparing pigment with dye printers focuses on printing on photo paper instead of cardstock. Our main concern is that prints on Canon's Pixma Pro-100 would fade too soon.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2014 20:33:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Desktop-Inkjet-Printers/Worth-upgrading-printer-for-cardstock/m-p/93950#M5391</guid>
      <dc:creator>jonathane40</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-18T20:33:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

