<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic CanoScan 9000F Mark II - Why do I get different results from AutoScan vs using IJ Scan Utility? in Desktop Inkjet Printers</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Desktop-Inkjet-Printers/CanoScan-9000F-Mark-II-Why-do-I-get-different-results-from/m-p/37162#M29252</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;When I use AutoScan my old B&amp;amp;W photos scan normally.&amp;nbsp; When I use IJ Scan Utility they are much darker, like a negative.&amp;nbsp; Settings appear to be the same . . .&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2013 18:28:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SacVet</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-08-17T18:28:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CanoScan 9000F Mark II - Why do I get different results from AutoScan vs using IJ Scan Utility?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Desktop-Inkjet-Printers/CanoScan-9000F-Mark-II-Why-do-I-get-different-results-from/m-p/37162#M29252</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When I use AutoScan my old B&amp;amp;W photos scan normally.&amp;nbsp; When I use IJ Scan Utility they are much darker, like a negative.&amp;nbsp; Settings appear to be the same . . .&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2013 18:28:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Desktop-Inkjet-Printers/CanoScan-9000F-Mark-II-Why-do-I-get-different-results-from/m-p/37162#M29252</guid>
      <dc:creator>SacVet</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-17T18:28:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

