<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Picture scan quality poor on my mx892 in Desktop Inkjet Printers</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Desktop-Inkjet-Printers/Picture-scan-quality-poor-on-my-mx892/m-p/27381#M2217</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We just had our 4 yr olds pictures done and the scan came out very grainy and was not at all the quality I expected from a Canon.&amp;nbsp; The ink cartridges are all brand new, just replaced them.&amp;nbsp; Is there some settings that I missed? My old scanners were much better than this.&amp;nbsp; It was a 2x3 pic I just tried again...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 19:34:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>georgep</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-07T19:34:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Picture scan quality poor on my mx892</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Desktop-Inkjet-Printers/Picture-scan-quality-poor-on-my-mx892/m-p/27381#M2217</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We just had our 4 yr olds pictures done and the scan came out very grainy and was not at all the quality I expected from a Canon.&amp;nbsp; The ink cartridges are all brand new, just replaced them.&amp;nbsp; Is there some settings that I missed? My old scanners were much better than this.&amp;nbsp; It was a 2x3 pic I just tried again...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 19:34:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Desktop-Inkjet-Printers/Picture-scan-quality-poor-on-my-mx892/m-p/27381#M2217</guid>
      <dc:creator>georgep</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-07T19:34:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

