<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Canon PIXMA TS8320 versus TS9120 flimsiness in Desktop Inkjet Printers</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Desktop-Inkjet-Printers/Canon-PIXMA-TS8320-versus-TS9120-flimsiness/m-p/329894#M11834</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Does the Canon PIXMA TS9120, which costs $30 more, have less flimsy trays than the TS8320? Some reviews claim that the TS8320 rear tray is so flimsy that it is about to break, and that it sometimes falls off.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2021 06:24:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Callistemon</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-01-02T06:24:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Canon PIXMA TS8320 versus TS9120 flimsiness</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Desktop-Inkjet-Printers/Canon-PIXMA-TS8320-versus-TS9120-flimsiness/m-p/329894#M11834</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Does the Canon PIXMA TS9120, which costs $30 more, have less flimsy trays than the TS8320? Some reviews claim that the TS8320 rear tray is so flimsy that it is about to break, and that it sometimes falls off.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2021 06:24:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Desktop-Inkjet-Printers/Canon-PIXMA-TS8320-versus-TS9120-flimsiness/m-p/329894#M11834</guid>
      <dc:creator>Callistemon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-02T06:24:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

