<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic DPP software feature request in Camera Software</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Camera-Software/DPP-software-feature-request/m-p/376530#M12777</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;When using a manual only lens with no electronics, DPP does not permit one to do diffraction correction. I would guess that the only information about the lens that is needed to do a Richardson/Lucy deconvolution to correct diffraction is the F number and maybe the focal length. If the user could be prompted for that information, I expect that diffraction correction would work. Using GMIC on a command line works if one gives parameters that match the F number and the pixel pitch on the sensor. The pixel pitch on the sensor is already known by DPP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Discussion and criticism will be welcome.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;John&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2022 19:53:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>johnrmoyer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-06-17T19:53:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DPP software feature request</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Camera-Software/DPP-software-feature-request/m-p/376530#M12777</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When using a manual only lens with no electronics, DPP does not permit one to do diffraction correction. I would guess that the only information about the lens that is needed to do a Richardson/Lucy deconvolution to correct diffraction is the F number and maybe the focal length. If the user could be prompted for that information, I expect that diffraction correction would work. Using GMIC on a command line works if one gives parameters that match the F number and the pixel pitch on the sensor. The pixel pitch on the sensor is already known by DPP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Discussion and criticism will be welcome.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;John&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2022 19:53:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Camera-Software/DPP-software-feature-request/m-p/376530#M12777</guid>
      <dc:creator>johnrmoyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-17T19:53:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DPP software feature request</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Camera-Software/DPP-software-feature-request/m-p/376532#M12778</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What if you did some edits to the EXIF data, starting [with] the f/stop?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2022 20:05:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Camera-Software/DPP-software-feature-request/m-p/376532#M12778</guid>
      <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-17T20:05:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DPP software feature request</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Camera-Software/DPP-software-feature-request/m-p/376540#M12779</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/65668"&gt;@Waddizzle&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;What if you did some edits to the EXIF data, starting [with] the f/stop?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;7196 exiftool -LensModel='Minolta MC ROKKOR-X PG 1:1.4 f=50mm' IMG_9568.CR3&lt;BR /&gt;7197 exiftool -Xmp:LicensorURL='&lt;A href="https://www.rsok.com/copyright.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.rsok.com/copyright.html&lt;/A&gt;' IMG_9568.CR3&lt;BR /&gt;7198 exiftool -FocalLength='50' IMG_9568.CR3&lt;BR /&gt;7199 exiftool -FNumber='16.0' IMG_9568.CR3&lt;BR /&gt;7200 exiftool -LensSerialNumber='3835202' IMG_9568.CR3&lt;BR /&gt;7201 exiftool IMG_9568.CR3 | less -M&lt;BR /&gt;7202 history -30&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The diffraction correction is still grayed out in DPP. I have not tried identifying this as a Canon lens and I have not modified all of the locations where F number or aperture is stored.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2022 21:00:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Camera-Software/DPP-software-feature-request/m-p/376540#M12779</guid>
      <dc:creator>johnrmoyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-17T21:00:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DPP software feature request</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Camera-Software/DPP-software-feature-request/m-p/376542#M12780</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Here is the photo.&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Rudbeckia hirta in Norman, Oklahoma, United States on 17 June 2022" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/34582i6DC6712245EC3A42/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="IMG_9568cs2.JPG" alt="Rudbeckia hirta in Norman, Oklahoma, United States on 17 June 2022" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;Rudbeckia hirta in Norman, Oklahoma, United States on 17 June 2022&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2022 21:07:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Camera-Software/DPP-software-feature-request/m-p/376542#M12780</guid>
      <dc:creator>johnrmoyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-17T21:07:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DPP software feature request</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Camera-Software/DPP-software-feature-request/m-p/376550#M12781</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I made a photo with the lens cap on an EF 50mm F/1.8 STM and did the following as an experiment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;7214 cp -i IMG_9568.CR3 IMG_9568ex.CR3&lt;BR /&gt;7215 cp -ip /Volumes/EOS_DIGITAL/DCIM/100CANON/IMG_9569.CR3 .&lt;BR /&gt;7216 exiftool -tagsfromfile IMG_9569.CR3 IMG_9568ex.CR3&lt;BR /&gt;7217 exiftool -G0:2 IMG_9569.CR3 &amp;gt;&amp;gt; IMG_9569.exif&lt;BR /&gt;7218 exiftool -G0:2 IMG_9568ex.CR3 &amp;gt;&amp;gt; IMG_9568ex.exif&lt;BR /&gt;7219 diff IMG_9569.exif IMG_9568ex.exif | less&lt;BR /&gt;7220 exiftool -lensid IMG_9569.CR3 IMG_9568ex.CR3&lt;BR /&gt;7221 exiftool -"*apertur*" IMG_9569.CR3 IMG_9568ex.CR3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This did not make the metadata the same for the two files, but did make the lensid the same. The diffraction correction was still grayed out in DPP.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2022 22:02:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Camera-Software/DPP-software-feature-request/m-p/376550#M12781</guid>
      <dc:creator>johnrmoyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-17T22:02:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

