<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cannon EOS 70d v Cannon EOS R50 in Gear Guide</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Cannon-EOS-70d-v-Cannon-EOS-R50/m-p/544486#M837</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I don’t have any lenses yet, if I were to get the cannon 18-55mm and the cannon 70-200 would I need an adapter&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2025 20:17:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rgauden</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-04-13T20:17:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cannon EOS 70d v Cannon EOS R50</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Cannon-EOS-70d-v-Cannon-EOS-R50/m-p/544483#M835</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I was planning on originally getting the cannon 70D but heard to look into something different. I found the R50 for like $20 more and was wondering if that’s the better choice? Thanks for the help.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2025 19:52:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Cannon-EOS-70d-v-Cannon-EOS-R50/m-p/544483#M835</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rgauden</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-13T19:52:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cannon EOS 70d v Cannon EOS R50</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Cannon-EOS-70d-v-Cannon-EOS-R50/m-p/544484#M836</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do you have any existing lenses? If so, what kind? For example, if you have EF or EF-S and opt to going with the EOS R50, you'd need an adapter ($99).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you're starting new, the EOS R50 would be the way to go. &amp;nbsp;Be sure to budget lenses. &amp;nbsp;Look at either RF-S or RF lenses.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2025 19:57:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Cannon-EOS-70d-v-Cannon-EOS-R50/m-p/544484#M836</guid>
      <dc:creator>rs-eos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-13T19:57:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cannon EOS 70d v Cannon EOS R50</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Cannon-EOS-70d-v-Cannon-EOS-R50/m-p/544486#M837</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don’t have any lenses yet, if I were to get the cannon 18-55mm and the cannon 70-200 would I need an adapter&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2025 20:17:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Cannon-EOS-70d-v-Cannon-EOS-R50/m-p/544486#M837</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rgauden</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-13T20:17:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cannon EOS 70d v Cannon EOS R50</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Cannon-EOS-70d-v-Cannon-EOS-R50/m-p/544487#M838</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you're looking at RF lenses (e.g. the RF-S 18-45mm; note that this RF version only goes to 45mm), you do not need an adapter. &amp;nbsp;Since you're starting new, I'd strongly recommend sticking with RF lenses.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However, if you're on a budget and want to pick up potentially cheaper EF-S or EF lenses, then yes, you'd need an adapter for those.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2025 20:23:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Cannon-EOS-70d-v-Cannon-EOS-R50/m-p/544487#M838</guid>
      <dc:creator>rs-eos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-13T20:23:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

