<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Best lens for wedding pictures in Gear Guide</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Best-lens-for-wedding-pictures/m-p/544411#M827</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;There is no single best lens for weddings. For such events, you need have versatility. &amp;nbsp;Some things that the pros typically use:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;70-200mm f/2.8&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;24-70mm f/2.8 (or wider angle for large group photos)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;100mm f/2.8 Macro (for detail shots; e.g. rings)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Potentially primes with very wide apertures (f/1.2 to f/1.8)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2025 15:14:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rs-eos</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-04-13T15:14:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Best lens for wedding pictures</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Best-lens-for-wedding-pictures/m-p/544406#M826</link>
      <description />
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2025 14:40:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Best-lens-for-wedding-pictures/m-p/544406#M826</guid>
      <dc:creator>jmrrandall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-13T14:40:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best lens for wedding pictures</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Best-lens-for-wedding-pictures/m-p/544411#M827</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There is no single best lens for weddings. For such events, you need have versatility. &amp;nbsp;Some things that the pros typically use:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;70-200mm f/2.8&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;24-70mm f/2.8 (or wider angle for large group photos)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;100mm f/2.8 Macro (for detail shots; e.g. rings)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Potentially primes with very wide apertures (f/1.2 to f/1.8)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2025 15:14:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Best-lens-for-wedding-pictures/m-p/544411#M827</guid>
      <dc:creator>rs-eos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-13T15:14:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best lens for wedding pictures</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Best-lens-for-wedding-pictures/m-p/544424#M829</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"There is no single best lens for weddings.&amp;nbsp;"&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have to disagree with that. After doing wedding for nearly half a century I can very confidently say the ef/rf 24-70mm f2.8L is the best wedding lens. Are there other lenses that are "nice" to have, certainly but the OP asked for the best lens. I had four of them , still have two, and I can easily say one was one my camera(s) 90% of the time.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Primes, any prime even like a 100mm macro is way down on the list to almost not helpful at all. I don't ever remember using the 100mm macro (although I do own one) but I did use my 400mm prime, only very rarely. There was a time when primes ruled but that was back in the olden days.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This is a difficult question to answer because situations and conditions change but still the answer to what is the best wedding lens, it is the 24-70mm f2.8L without hesitation.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2025 16:09:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Best-lens-for-wedding-pictures/m-p/544424#M829</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-13T16:09:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

