<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: RF 100-500mm f/4-7.1L IS USM in Gear Guide</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/RF-100-500mm-f-4-7-1L-IS-USM-vs-EF-100-400-II/m-p/544304#M820</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;This user has a R7 and EF 100-400 combo.&amp;nbsp; Nice results.&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":thumbs_up:"&gt;👍&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Share-Your-Photos/reflections-of-a-great-egret/td-p/544285" target="_blank"&gt;reflections of a great egret - Canon Community&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 16:03:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>shadowsports</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-04-12T16:03:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RF 100-500mm f/4-7.1L IS USM vs EF 100-400 II</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/RF-100-500mm-f-4-7-1L-IS-USM-vs-EF-100-400-II/m-p/544286#M818</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey guys I’m just waiting for my new lens to come I’m currently using the EF 100-400 II, will I notice a big improvement with this lens? I’m using a Canon R5. has anybody used a teleconverter with this? How well does it work? If I wanted more reach would I be better buying an R7 instead of the teleconverter?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 16:10:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/RF-100-500mm-f-4-7-1L-IS-USM-vs-EF-100-400-II/m-p/544286#M818</guid>
      <dc:creator>fossil786</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-15T16:10:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RF 100-500mm f/4-7.1L IS USM</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/RF-100-500mm-f-4-7-1L-IS-USM-vs-EF-100-400-II/m-p/544299#M819</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Greetings,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I own this lens and a RF 1.4x TC.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The lens is very sharp.&amp;nbsp; 100mm is not a great deal of extra reach.&amp;nbsp; The RF200-800 might have been a better option, but this depends on shooting conditions.&amp;nbsp; I am in no way trying to diminish your purchase.&amp;nbsp; The RF 100-500 is one of my&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;favorite&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt; lenses.&amp;nbsp; I use it much more than my 200-800.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;These were shot with my 100-500, no TC.&amp;nbsp; Oslo Norway&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="500mm, f11, 1/640, ISO 200" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/58889iD0D7C292839DD89C/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="IMG_2060_DxO.jpg" alt="500mm, f11, 1/640, ISO 200" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;500mm, f11, 1/640, ISO 200&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="100mm, f11, 1/250, ISO 100" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/58891i5AA6EAB6E5F5C253/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="IMG_2056_DxO.jpg" alt="100mm, f11, 1/250, ISO 100" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;100mm, f11, 1/250, ISO 100&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Here is another from Alaska.&amp;nbsp; Hubbard Glacier.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Hubbard Glacier" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/45491iF5F786F2A68C7E5B/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="IMG_0716_DxO.jpg" alt="Hubbard Glacier" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;Hubbard Glacier&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;If you want to use a TC, the lens has to be zoomed to 300mm or more before connecting the TC.&amp;nbsp; You'll lose a stop of light with 1.4x, and 2 if used with the 2.0x.&amp;nbsp; I would not use it with a 2.0x TC, but that is up to you.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I use the collar / foot as a carry handle 100% of the time except when tripod mounted.&amp;nbsp; Make sure you have a retention system.&amp;nbsp; My preferred carry method is a black rapids wrist strap connected to the mount on the bottom of the body and using the foot as a handle.&amp;nbsp; This way there is no way you will "lose" the camera or lens.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The R7 is certainly an option.&amp;nbsp; Since you are using an R5, you might try putting it in crop mode.&amp;nbsp; While your image resolution will drop to about 17MP, this might be acceptable depending on what you plan to do with your output.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 15:44:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/RF-100-500mm-f-4-7-1L-IS-USM-vs-EF-100-400-II/m-p/544299#M819</guid>
      <dc:creator>shadowsports</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-12T15:44:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RF 100-500mm f/4-7.1L IS USM</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/RF-100-500mm-f-4-7-1L-IS-USM-vs-EF-100-400-II/m-p/544304#M820</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This user has a R7 and EF 100-400 combo.&amp;nbsp; Nice results.&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":thumbs_up:"&gt;👍&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Share-Your-Photos/reflections-of-a-great-egret/td-p/544285" target="_blank"&gt;reflections of a great egret - Canon Community&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 16:03:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/RF-100-500mm-f-4-7-1L-IS-USM-vs-EF-100-400-II/m-p/544304#M820</guid>
      <dc:creator>shadowsports</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-12T16:03:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

