<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: EF 400mm F4 DO II  vs  EF 500mm F4 ii in Gear Guide</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/EF-400mm-F4-DO-II-vs-EF-500mm-F4-ii/m-p/532885#M627</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;If you are still wanting an EF mount than get the&amp;nbsp;Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2. If you want to buy RF get the&amp;nbsp;Canon RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM Lens. Like they say you can never have too much focal length.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;IMHO, ditch the 1.4x tel-con and get DPP4 form Canon. It is a huge debate which is better a tel-con or crop in post edit. Crop in post doesn't suffer the penalties that the tel-con brings to the table.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 15:20:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-02-06T15:20:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>EF 400mm F4 DO II  vs  EF 500mm F4 ii</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/EF-400mm-F4-DO-II-vs-EF-500mm-F4-ii/m-p/532788#M626</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I mainly photograph birds (often small) and own the 400mm DO ii (also the RF 100-500).&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;I have been very happy with the 400 DO II, even with the 1.4 iii extender.&amp;nbsp; However, I'm looking to move to something with a little more reach that will take the 1.4 iii as well or better than the 400 DO II.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm thinking of buying the EF 500 F4 II, since I'm not able to justify one of the RF super teles.&amp;nbsp; I'd appreciate any input from those who have experience with either or both lenses.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it worth the switch?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the IQ or the 500 significantly better (especially with that 1.4 attached)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mike A&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 22:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/EF-400mm-F4-DO-II-vs-EF-500mm-F4-ii/m-p/532788#M626</guid>
      <dc:creator>mikeaff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-05T22:01:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EF 400mm F4 DO II  vs  EF 500mm F4 ii</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/EF-400mm-F4-DO-II-vs-EF-500mm-F4-ii/m-p/532885#M627</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you are still wanting an EF mount than get the&amp;nbsp;Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2. If you want to buy RF get the&amp;nbsp;Canon RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM Lens. Like they say you can never have too much focal length.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;IMHO, ditch the 1.4x tel-con and get DPP4 form Canon. It is a huge debate which is better a tel-con or crop in post edit. Crop in post doesn't suffer the penalties that the tel-con brings to the table.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 15:20:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/EF-400mm-F4-DO-II-vs-EF-500mm-F4-ii/m-p/532885#M627</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-06T15:20:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EF 400mm F4 DO II  vs  EF 500mm F4 ii</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/EF-400mm-F4-DO-II-vs-EF-500mm-F4-ii/m-p/539772#M628</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the suggestions. I'm staying away from 3rd party lenses as they don't focus as well adapted to my R5. But I did rent the RF 200-800 and am really impressed. I was a little leery of the aperture, but it really hasn't been much of a problem.&amp;nbsp; The resolving power on the R5 is really pretty incredible for the price of this lens-amazing fine detail.&amp;nbsp; It accomplishes nearly everything I was hoping to accomplish with the 500 F4 w/ the 1.4x.&amp;nbsp; I don't feel like you give away much, other than the low light performance. Even the backgrounds at longer distances look similar to the F4 prime.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;I'm going with the 200-800 for that huge extra reach and resolving power and price. Thanks for the advice&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2025 13:40:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/EF-400mm-F4-DO-II-vs-EF-500mm-F4-ii/m-p/539772#M628</guid>
      <dc:creator>mikeaff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-16T13:40:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EF 400mm F4 DO II  vs  EF 500mm F4 ii</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/EF-400mm-F4-DO-II-vs-EF-500mm-F4-ii/m-p/539778#M629</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"&amp;nbsp;I'm going with the 200-800 for that huge extra reach&amp;nbsp;..."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Sounds like a plan but get DPP4, too. And always shoot raw.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2025 14:13:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/EF-400mm-F4-DO-II-vs-EF-500mm-F4-ii/m-p/539778#M629</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-16T14:13:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

