<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic 100-400L ii replacement suggestions in Gear Guide</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/100-400L-ii-replacement-suggestions/m-p/598190#M4352</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, since I'm the happy owner of the RF 100-400 I'm willing to sell my EF 100-400L ii to replace it with something else as is getting little use.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am strongly considering the ef 300 2.8 IS first version but I'm here to ask your opinion on this!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I mainly shoot birds with an r7, I like to shoot at dusk to include environment. Handholding or with an heavy fluid head (Manfrotto 502). I don't post much online but I print, so high sharpness and accurate autofocus are necessary. Whether sealing is much appreciated but not necessary.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What about a 70-200? f/2.8 or f/4? Ef or RF? What about the ef 300 F4? Any other hidden gem you know I'm missing? Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 13:21:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ekrartona</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-06-06T13:21:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>100-400L ii replacement suggestions</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/100-400L-ii-replacement-suggestions/m-p/598190#M4352</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, since I'm the happy owner of the RF 100-400 I'm willing to sell my EF 100-400L ii to replace it with something else as is getting little use.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am strongly considering the ef 300 2.8 IS first version but I'm here to ask your opinion on this!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I mainly shoot birds with an r7, I like to shoot at dusk to include environment. Handholding or with an heavy fluid head (Manfrotto 502). I don't post much online but I print, so high sharpness and accurate autofocus are necessary. Whether sealing is much appreciated but not necessary.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What about a 70-200? f/2.8 or f/4? Ef or RF? What about the ef 300 F4? Any other hidden gem you know I'm missing? Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 13:21:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/100-400L-ii-replacement-suggestions/m-p/598190#M4352</guid>
      <dc:creator>ekrartona</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-06-06T13:21:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 100-400L ii replacement suggestions</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/100-400L-ii-replacement-suggestions/m-p/598194#M4353</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Greetings,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So you are shooting birds with a 32 MP sensor and full frame lenses.&amp;nbsp; This is giving you a more narrow field of view with cropping ability.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'd probably recommend the RF 200-800 or the RF 100-500 for wildlife.&amp;nbsp; That brings up your preferred shooting scenarios.&amp;nbsp; Dusk and evening.&amp;nbsp; Both of my recommendations offer more comfortable focal length and reach, They don't offer the constant f2.8 that a EF 300 would.&amp;nbsp; However, neither has to be adapted.&amp;nbsp; Just because my preference is&amp;nbsp;RF doesn't mean that a EF lens on a mirrorless body is a bad choice.&amp;nbsp; I had very good luck adapting EF lenses to my R5 C until I fully migrated to RF glass.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Some other strengths that you'd probably see using RF over EF is better subject tracking and faster focus acquisition.&amp;nbsp; Maybe this isn't as important to you If all you shoot is stationary subjects.&amp;nbsp; You could see some rolling shutter using an older adapted EF lens when shooting high frame rates.&amp;nbsp; Maybe not with mechanical shutter but definitely with electronic. This may or may not be applicable to your use cases.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It might be worthwhile for you to rent One or more of these lenses before making a final decision.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 13:31:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/100-400L-ii-replacement-suggestions/m-p/598194#M4353</guid>
      <dc:creator>shadowsports</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-06-06T13:31:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 100-400L ii replacement suggestions</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/100-400L-ii-replacement-suggestions/m-p/598431#M4361</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;According to&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://canon.jp/support/repair/period" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://canon.jp/support/repair/period&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;the repair period for the EF 300 f/2.8 will end November 2028.&amp;nbsp; I agree with&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/99879"&gt;@shadowsports&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;about rental being a good idea before making such a significant purchase.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The EF 70-200 was a great lens.&amp;nbsp; I still have one but will be selling it as a I bought the RF Z version.&amp;nbsp; I'm on a R6 Mark II. The AF is faster, weight is lighter, coatings slightly better, etc.&amp;nbsp; It's just a better, lighter, faster lens because it's a latest technology lens.&amp;nbsp; I wouldn't personally buy nor recommend a new EF lens again for an RF camera (used, yes, but not new).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Only you can decide about focal length.&amp;nbsp; I also like my RF 200-800.&amp;nbsp; It's a great value IMO, and you can see a ton of examples of folks shooting birds with it in the gallery.&amp;nbsp; Yes, it's a bit dark, but IBIS and IS buy several stops for low light.&amp;nbsp; I've taken several 800mm shots and marveled at the IS and IBIS combination shooting handheld, and even how well it does what are effectively macro shots.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Good luck on your decision!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 20:18:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/100-400L-ii-replacement-suggestions/m-p/598431#M4361</guid>
      <dc:creator>SignifDigits</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-06-08T20:18:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

