<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: R50 birding/aviation lens help in Gear Guide</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Birding-aviation-lens-recommendations-for-EOS-R50/m-p/583222#M3301</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Always best to go RF if you have a R series camera. IMHO, I would buy one of the 150-600mm super zooms over any other ‘adapted’ EF lens. The best 150-600mm is the Tamron G2 model.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 18:45:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-01-19T18:45:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Birding/aviation lens recommendations for EOS R50</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Birding-aviation-lens-recommendations-for-EOS-R50/m-p/583121#M3297</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello! I currently use an r50 for bird and aviation photography, and want to upgrade my lens. The only lenses that fit within my budget are the ef 100-400 USM I (I have the adapter) and the rf 100-400. I would be buying these used. I am struggling to choose between the two lenses. (or are there any other options in that price range?)Any help is appreciated!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 14:23:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Birding-aviation-lens-recommendations-for-EOS-R50/m-p/583121#M3297</guid>
      <dc:creator>slimmy0</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-20T14:23:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R50 birding/aviation lens help</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Birding-aviation-lens-recommendations-for-EOS-R50/m-p/583123#M3298</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Greetings ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;From a long term investment standpoint, an RF mount lens would represent a better investment strategy since you already own a mirrorless body.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There is nothing wrong with the EF 100-400.&amp;nbsp; Make sure you buy a mk II copy as this version is still under support. It has slightly better variable aperture support to.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In order for us to provide possible alternatives, we would need an actual budget $$$.&amp;nbsp; However, there may not be much available at lower (used) price points.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2026 22:27:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Birding-aviation-lens-recommendations-for-EOS-R50/m-p/583123#M3298</guid>
      <dc:creator>shadowsports</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-18T22:27:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R50 birding/aviation lens help</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Birding-aviation-lens-recommendations-for-EOS-R50/m-p/583124#M3299</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I agree with Rick (shadowsports) the RF make better sense for the future.&amp;nbsp; But if you get a great deal on the EF go for it.&amp;nbsp; I say always get the latest tech you can afford.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2026 22:36:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Birding-aviation-lens-recommendations-for-EOS-R50/m-p/583124#M3299</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomRamsey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-18T22:36:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R50 birding/aviation lens help</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Birding-aviation-lens-recommendations-for-EOS-R50/m-p/583222#M3301</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Always best to go RF if you have a R series camera. IMHO, I would buy one of the 150-600mm super zooms over any other ‘adapted’ EF lens. The best 150-600mm is the Tamron G2 model.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 18:45:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Birding-aviation-lens-recommendations-for-EOS-R50/m-p/583222#M3301</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-19T18:45:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R50 birding/aviation lens help</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Birding-aviation-lens-recommendations-for-EOS-R50/m-p/583223#M3302</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Consider there is a huge difference and benefit with 600mm vs 400mm.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 18:46:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Birding-aviation-lens-recommendations-for-EOS-R50/m-p/583223#M3302</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-19T18:46:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Birding/aviation lens recommendations for EOS R50</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Birding-aviation-lens-recommendations-for-EOS-R50/m-p/583398#M3306</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;And with the R50 being an APS-C camera with a 1.6x crop factor it would result in an equivalent field of view of a&lt;BR /&gt;160-640mm lens which would offer pretty good reach for wildlife or sports.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you have the money for the RF100-400mm it would be best to purchase it and start building you stable of lenses specifically for the body you own.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And you ask&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;or are there any other options in that price range? &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;But the range for used is all over the place depending on condition. What range are you working with for a budget.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 02:30:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Birding-aviation-lens-recommendations-for-EOS-R50/m-p/583398#M3306</guid>
      <dc:creator>March411</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-21T02:30:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Birding/aviation lens recommendations for EOS R50</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Birding-aviation-lens-recommendations-for-EOS-R50/m-p/583460#M3311</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"...&amp;nbsp;with a 1.6x crop factor it would result in an equivalent field of view of a&amp;nbsp;160-640mm lens which would offer pretty good reach for wildlife or sports."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It always has been and will probably always will be the hot topic debate, which is better. The crop factor tele advantage or the crop in post. I certainly don't have&amp;nbsp;empirical proof for either. One day I go one way and the next day the other. I will say on this topic I favor, in my mind, native FL as better. So to me, IMHO, the Canon 200-800mm is even a better choice.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The same argument can be made as to whether a tel-con is better or agin is crop in post better? Once more I favor native FL.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 15:18:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Birding-aviation-lens-recommendations-for-EOS-R50/m-p/583460#M3311</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-21T15:18:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Birding/aviation lens recommendations for EOS R50</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Birding-aviation-lens-recommendations-for-EOS-R50/m-p/583465#M3312</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would agree Ernie!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If someone asks a question regarding the RF200-800 or throws out a budget that would allow them to purchase that lens I would strongly recommend it. When someone discusses a limited budget or inquires if the RF100-400 is a good wildlife lens I answer the question directly only taking into account the OP's inquiry.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On an APS-C that would be a pretty decent lens. I personally use it on APS-C and FF with great results. It has an aggressive price point and produces quality images.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That being said, the RF200-800mm is a great lens, it's almost always mounted on my R5.&amp;nbsp;I'm patiently waiting to see what happens with the R7 MkII, if rumors are true and some of the issues reported are resolved I will pick one up and the RF200-800mm will have a new home.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 15:28:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Birding-aviation-lens-recommendations-for-EOS-R50/m-p/583465#M3312</guid>
      <dc:creator>March411</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-21T15:28:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Birding/aviation lens recommendations for EOS R50</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Birding-aviation-lens-recommendations-for-EOS-R50/m-p/583574#M3318</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Of course one of my favorite quotes is, "The lens you have is always better than the lens you wish you had." I coined that many decades ago but it is still true. However, a person that has limited money, who doesn't anymore, the quote has a different context. Sometimes buying a less expensive choice ends up being the most expensive choice.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It appears that both of us are, or have been, fortunate enough to have many lenses. Sometimes perspective is lost.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 15:41:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Birding-aviation-lens-recommendations-for-EOS-R50/m-p/583574#M3318</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-22T15:41:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

