<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Has anyone used the rf 45mm 1.2? in Gear Guide</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Has-anyone-used-the-rf-45mm-1-2/m-p/577117#M2822</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I think you are saying the 45mm f/1.2 wide open should be sharper than the 50mm f/1.8. Right?&amp;nbsp; What gives you that idea?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2025 21:38:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>normadel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-11-29T21:38:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Has anyone used the rf 45mm 1.2?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Has-anyone-used-the-rf-45mm-1-2/m-p/577067#M2816</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Had anyone uses th3 new lens and isn't shaper than either the rf50mm 1.8 or the ef 50mm 1.2L. I'm not expecting rf 50mm 1.2L performance because that's expecting too much. But it should be sharper wide open the the 1.8. Snd it definitely should be better wide open the ef 1.2L which was known for its softness and chromatic aberation.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2025 15:54:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Has-anyone-used-the-rf-45mm-1-2/m-p/577067#M2816</guid>
      <dc:creator>alomah3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-29T15:54:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Has anyone used the rf 45mm 1.2?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Has-anyone-used-the-rf-45mm-1-2/m-p/577117#M2822</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think you are saying the 45mm f/1.2 wide open should be sharper than the 50mm f/1.8. Right?&amp;nbsp; What gives you that idea?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2025 21:38:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Has-anyone-used-the-rf-45mm-1-2/m-p/577117#M2822</guid>
      <dc:creator>normadel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-29T21:38:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Has anyone used the rf 45mm 1.2?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Has-anyone-used-the-rf-45mm-1-2/m-p/577168#M2825</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screen Shot 2025-11-30 at 06.18.34 AM.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/71808i0A435EB57BFDBBBE/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Screen Shot 2025-11-30 at 06.18.34 AM.png" alt="Screen Shot 2025-11-30 at 06.18.34 AM.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can reach your own conclusions here.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2025 11:19:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Has-anyone-used-the-rf-45mm-1-2/m-p/577168#M2825</guid>
      <dc:creator>jrhoffman75</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-30T11:19:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

