<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: EOS R6 Mark II lens recommendations for portraits, travel, and landscapes in Gear Guide</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/EOS-R6-Mark-II-lens-recommendations-for-portraits-travel-and/m-p/576053#M2739</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I agree with this, &lt;EM&gt;"&amp;nbsp;I think it's hard to choose a better lens than the RF 24-70mm F2.8L,&amp;nbsp;..."&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"The choice of the 35mm F1.8 is not a bad idea ..."&lt;/EM&gt;. I don't see it as a good idea. Not at first anyway. You will have 35mm already included in the&amp;nbsp;RF 24-70mm F2.8L. Sometime put a piece of gaffers tape on the&amp;nbsp;RF 24-70mm F2.8L at the 35mm mark and fix it there. Live with it for a good long while. What is it doing for you? The only upside is the faster aperture the rest not so much. Do you really need that?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 15:11:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-11-21T15:11:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>EOS R6 Mark II lens recommendations for portraits, travel, and landscapes</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/EOS-R6-Mark-II-lens-recommendations-for-portraits-travel-and/m-p/576021#M2733</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I recently traded-up my R10 to an R6MII and was looking for some recommendations/affirmation on the lenses I was eyeing. Looking to do some more shooting with portraits, travel (occasional night/street shooting), and landscapes.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The top two lenses I’m looking at are the 24-70 f/2.8 and 35mm f/1.8. I feel like it covers multiple bases, but wasn’t sure if I’m on the right track with these, or if there were any others I should consider.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 13:23:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/EOS-R6-Mark-II-lens-recommendations-for-portraits-travel-and/m-p/576021#M2733</guid>
      <dc:creator>douji</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-21T13:23:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Canon R6 Mark II (+ lenses)</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/EOS-R6-Mark-II-lens-recommendations-for-portraits-travel-and/m-p/576032#M2734</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;A nice upgrade, I still have my EOS R10 and shoot it along with an EOS R6 Mark II myself. I think it's hard to choose a better lens than the RF 24-70mm F2.8L, the only other I would consider if the size and weight at not a problem, and the budget allows is the RF 24-105mm F2.8L. If you do go for the 24-70mm then maybe choose the RF 85mm F2 Macro IS STM lens for a little more reach for portraits.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The choice of the 35mm F1.8 is not a bad idea, but with only 1 1/3-stop faster aperture it would be as easy to simply raise the ISO in most situations and shoot at f/2.8.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;LI-PRODUCT title="RF24-105mm F2.8 L IS USM Z" id="rf24105f28isusmz"&gt;&lt;/LI-PRODUCT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;LI-PRODUCT title="RF 24-70 F2.8 L IS USM" id="RF24-70"&gt;&lt;/LI-PRODUCT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;LI-PRODUCT title="RF85mm F2 Macro US STM" id="rf85f2"&gt;&lt;/LI-PRODUCT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 09:36:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/EOS-R6-Mark-II-lens-recommendations-for-portraits-travel-and/m-p/576032#M2734</guid>
      <dc:creator>p4pictures</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-21T09:36:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EOS R6 Mark II lens recommendations for portraits, travel, and landscapes</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/EOS-R6-Mark-II-lens-recommendations-for-portraits-travel-and/m-p/576053#M2739</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I agree with this, &lt;EM&gt;"&amp;nbsp;I think it's hard to choose a better lens than the RF 24-70mm F2.8L,&amp;nbsp;..."&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"The choice of the 35mm F1.8 is not a bad idea ..."&lt;/EM&gt;. I don't see it as a good idea. Not at first anyway. You will have 35mm already included in the&amp;nbsp;RF 24-70mm F2.8L. Sometime put a piece of gaffers tape on the&amp;nbsp;RF 24-70mm F2.8L at the 35mm mark and fix it there. Live with it for a good long while. What is it doing for you? The only upside is the faster aperture the rest not so much. Do you really need that?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 15:11:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/EOS-R6-Mark-II-lens-recommendations-for-portraits-travel-and/m-p/576053#M2739</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-21T15:11:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EOS R6 Mark II lens recommendations for portraits, travel, and landscapes</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/EOS-R6-Mark-II-lens-recommendations-for-portraits-travel-and/m-p/576054#M2740</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;BTW, one more thought, if you must have a fixed FL prime lens the 35mm is my favorite on a FF camera. Of fixed FL primes the 35mm is probably the easiest one to live with for GP work.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 15:14:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/EOS-R6-Mark-II-lens-recommendations-for-portraits-travel-and/m-p/576054#M2740</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-21T15:14:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

