<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: EF 24-70 f2.8 II v RF 24-105 f4 in Gear Guide</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/EF-24-70-f2-8-II-v-RF-24-105-f4/m-p/569180#M2231</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Greetings,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The claims about the lens being better is in regards to its corner to center sharpness.&amp;nbsp; Many consider the 24-70 focal length to be a little better.&amp;nbsp; Besides the size, weight difference and additional reach, you will also get IS.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Since you use the lens primarily for landscapes, moving from f2.8 to f4 will not be to impactful.&amp;nbsp; The RF24-105 f4 is a great walk around lens on the R5.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 13:56:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>shadowsports</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-09-24T13:56:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>EF 24-70 f2.8 II v RF 24-105 f4</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/EF-24-70-f2-8-II-v-RF-24-105-f4/m-p/569173#M2230</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anybody switched from the EF 24-70 f2.8ii to the RF 24-105 f4?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the EF lens but I’m thinking about swapping to the RF on my R5 due to it being lighter and smaller (especially given I need to use the EF to RF adapter) and the extra reach.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will be using this lens almost entirely for landscapes. I hike with the camera so the smaller overall package is appealing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I’ve found one reviewi comparing the lenses (which suggested the EF was the better lens) but wanted to see if anyone has experience swapping?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 13:29:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/EF-24-70-f2-8-II-v-RF-24-105-f4/m-p/569173#M2230</guid>
      <dc:creator>granelbo1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-24T13:29:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EF 24-70 f2.8 II v RF 24-105 f4</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/EF-24-70-f2-8-II-v-RF-24-105-f4/m-p/569180#M2231</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Greetings,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The claims about the lens being better is in regards to its corner to center sharpness.&amp;nbsp; Many consider the 24-70 focal length to be a little better.&amp;nbsp; Besides the size, weight difference and additional reach, you will also get IS.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Since you use the lens primarily for landscapes, moving from f2.8 to f4 will not be to impactful.&amp;nbsp; The RF24-105 f4 is a great walk around lens on the R5.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 13:56:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/EF-24-70-f2-8-II-v-RF-24-105-f4/m-p/569180#M2231</guid>
      <dc:creator>shadowsports</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-24T13:56:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

