<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Buy-once wildlife lens for relative newby in Gear Guide</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Buy-once-wildlife-lens-for-relative-newby/m-p/556973#M1557</link>
    <description>&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi all,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I’m shooting with a Canon R6 Mark II and an EF lineup that covers my kids (85mm f/1.4), landscapes (16–35mm f/4), and the occasional wildlife (70–200mm f/4).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I really want to get deeper into wildlife photography. I tend to get really into things, so this probably ends with me backpacking and traveling just to chase great shots.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;My philosophy is “buy once, grow into it.” I’d rather spend real money (within reason of course) on a lens that will last than keep upgrading piece by piece. I’m planning to set aside money now and pick up a used wildlife lens next summer — budget is around $2k, but I can stretch if it’s worth it.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Given that setup and mindset, what lenses should be on my shortlist? I’m open to EF or RF glass. My main issue with the 70-200 is that it just doesn’t reach far enough. I see myself shooting a range of wildlife, including birds.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks a ton for any advice!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2025 20:05:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ijpisarcik</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-07-13T20:05:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Buy-once wildlife lens for relative newby</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Buy-once-wildlife-lens-for-relative-newby/m-p/556973#M1557</link>
      <description>&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi all,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I’m shooting with a Canon R6 Mark II and an EF lineup that covers my kids (85mm f/1.4), landscapes (16–35mm f/4), and the occasional wildlife (70–200mm f/4).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I really want to get deeper into wildlife photography. I tend to get really into things, so this probably ends with me backpacking and traveling just to chase great shots.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;My philosophy is “buy once, grow into it.” I’d rather spend real money (within reason of course) on a lens that will last than keep upgrading piece by piece. I’m planning to set aside money now and pick up a used wildlife lens next summer — budget is around $2k, but I can stretch if it’s worth it.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Given that setup and mindset, what lenses should be on my shortlist? I’m open to EF or RF glass. My main issue with the 70-200 is that it just doesn’t reach far enough. I see myself shooting a range of wildlife, including birds.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks a ton for any advice!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2025 20:05:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Buy-once-wildlife-lens-for-relative-newby/m-p/556973#M1557</guid>
      <dc:creator>ijpisarcik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-13T20:05:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Buy-once wildlife lens for relative newby</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Buy-once-wildlife-lens-for-relative-newby/m-p/556979#M1558</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey&amp;nbsp; ijpisarcik,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Reading you post it's fairly easy to give a recommendation but when you mention hiking and backpacking it slowed me down. Size and weight would probably need to be a consideration unless you say it's no problem. The older I get this less weight I tote along in my pack.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Three lenses fit into your wish list/budget, well really two, the third is a great lens that I had to add to the list.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;RF200-800mmAperture F6.3-9 IS USM - $2100&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;RF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USM - $700 +&amp;nbsp;Extender RF1.4x $550 - Total $1250&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;RF100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM - $2900&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You mentioned used, these prices are for new and keep an eye on the &lt;A href="https://www.usa.canon.com/shop/camera-lenses/refurbished-camera-lenses?facet_lens_mount_type=1115" target="_self"&gt;Canon Refurbished Marketplace&lt;/A&gt;. Good deals pop up and equipment comes with a limited one year warranty.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Out of the three the&amp;nbsp;RF100-400mm and 1.4x is the lightest of the group. With the 1.4x you will end up with 160-640mm. I use this setup frequently because of it's portability and weight and it gives me options. The 1.4x extender fits nicely into the side pocket of cargo shorts/pants. With setup you will lose a little over a stop by adding the extender but end up around the same aperture range as the&amp;nbsp;RF200-800mm. With both grabbing enough light can be challenging. The&amp;nbsp;R6 Mark II which I also own is a good match because of it's sensor.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;All three of these lenses produces solid images with nice IQ it really just comes down to price and how much weight you want to carry.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2025 21:29:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Buy-once-wildlife-lens-for-relative-newby/m-p/556979#M1558</guid>
      <dc:creator>March411</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-13T21:29:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Buy-once wildlife lens for relative newby</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Buy-once-wildlife-lens-for-relative-newby/m-p/557055#M1567</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is easy there is only one lens you should even consider the&amp;nbsp;Canon RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM Lens. IMHO, of course. If you buy a lens limited to 400mm or even 500mm you will always find yourself wanting more. Always!&amp;nbsp; There is no substitute for FL and native FL is the best.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2025 14:56:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Gear-Guide/Buy-once-wildlife-lens-for-relative-newby/m-p/557055#M1567</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-14T14:56:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

