Canon Community Canon Community
 


Reply
New Contributor
anilkris
Posts: 4
Registered: ‎01-13-2013

EF 50mm f/1.8 II Vs.EF 50mm f/1.4 USM

Hi

 

Can you please compare EF 50mm f/1.8 II Vs.EF 50mm f/1.4 USM. Which is good ?

 

* Will the extra dollars spend on EF 50mm f/1.4 USM give an advantage over EF 50mm f/1.8 II.

* I use EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM. What advantage the 50mm provide if I am interested in profile and nature photography?

 

regards

Anil Krishnan

 

 

 

Please use plain text.
Respected Contributor
Skirball
Posts: 1,552
Registered: ‎02-28-2013

Re: EF 50mm f/1.8 II Vs.EF 50mm f/1.4 USM

There are a ton of discussions on the internet comparing these two lenses, I suggest searching around.

 

The 1.8 is popular because it is extremely cheap for a Canon lens.  Personally, I thought the money I spent upgrading to 1.4 was well worth it.  It’s much sharper wide open, the corners are sharper in general, and the better build and focus ring are worth the cost difference to me.  Others are totally happy with the 1.8.

 

In general, primes (< 2.8 aperture) have a wider maximum aperture than zooms, which gathers more light in than zooms, allowing you to shoot in darker settings.  That’s the primary reason people use them.  In addition, primes are generally sharper than zooms, the difference is much more noticeable in lower end zooms.   Whether this is worth it to you for profile and nature photography, I can’t say.   I’m not sure what profile means, but if it’s portraiture then yes, IMO it’s worth it to have a prime.

Please use plain text.
Esteemed Contributor
ebiggs1
Posts: 2,581
Registered: ‎12-07-2012

Re: EF 50mm f/1.8 II Vs.EF 50mm f/1.4 USM

"... it is extremely cheap for a Canon lens."

 

This really says it all. Save up for the f1.4.

EOS 1Ds Mk III, EOS 1D Mk IV EF 50mm f1.2 L, EF 24-70mm f2.8 L,
EF 70-200mm f2.8 L IS II, Sigma 120-300mm f2.8 EX APO
Photoshop CS6, ACR 8.7, Lightroom 5.7
Please use plain text.
Respected Contributor
Skirball
Posts: 1,552
Registered: ‎02-28-2013

Re: EF 50mm f/1.8 II Vs.EF 50mm f/1.4 USM


ebiggs1 wrote:

"... it is extremely cheap for a Canon lens."

 

This really says it all. Save up for the f1.4.


When Ebiggs and I agree on something, it has to be true.

Please use plain text.
powered by Lithium

LIKE US on Facebook FOLLOW US on Twitter WATCH US on YouTube CONNECT WITH US on Linkedin WATCH US on Vimeo FOLLOW US on Instagram SHOP CANON at the Canon Online Store
© Canon U.S.A., Inc.   |    Terms of Use   |    Privacy Statement